Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 18:27:34 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Patch: new GCC builtins for stdarg.h/varargs.h
In-Reply-To: <394E36F4.4180768E@softhome.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000619182600.27216e-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:

> Does this one look better?
> 
> +@findex va_list AT r{, GCC 2.96}
> +@findex va_start AT r{, GCC 2.96}

Yes.  But this is even better:

  @findex va_list AT r{, implemented with GCC built-ins}