Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 17:34:57 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Patch: sentinels for typedefs in headers
In-Reply-To: <39478705.3C3BE6A0@softhome.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000614173149.995G-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:

> Catched another one - our wint_t is 'int' and their 'unsigned int'.

The way we define wint_t will be important when (if) we support wide 
characters in a non-trivial way.  As long as our support is trivial, we 
can switch (in the next djdev) without risking any problems, I think.