Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 09:34:26 -0400
Message-Id: <200006141334.JAA05403@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200006141013.MAA19472@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> (message from Martin
	Stromberg on Wed, 14 Jun 2000 12:13:22 +0200 (MET DST))
Subject: Re: Patch: sentinels for typedefs in headers
References:  <200006141013 DOT MAA19472 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Perhaps someone with some official standing in DJGPP (that's DJ to gcc
> maintainers, I think) could take this up with gcc maintainers, so we
> can have an official statement from them on how they think it
> should/could work? 

I did, long ago.  Their answer was to port fixincludes to DJGPP.