Message-ID: <3947870A.3EC83B25@softhome.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 16:22:18 +0300
From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: lt,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Patch: sentinels for typedefs in headers
References: <200006141120 DOT NAA19541 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Martin Stromberg wrote:
> So I interpreted this no-answer-attitude as the gcc maintainers
> thinking they have another newbie whining at them, when e. g. Laurynas
> asked them. Hence making me think that the person who ported gcc to
> DOZE might have a better chance of getting a response.

Mark is listed there as the DJGPP maintainer.

> An other idea: perhaps Laurenyas could ask that (exactly same)
> question again. Perhaps we will get an answer if we are persistent?

I think if another person asks this question, it would show
that we see this problem as a team.

Personally I am not satisfied with how did I express that
question. Could anyone with better English than mine express
our point of view?

Laurynas