Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 09:37:12 -0400
Message-Id: <200006141337.JAA05510@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000614162012.841A-100000@is> (message from Eli
	Zaretskii on Wed, 14 Jun 2000 16:21:59 +0300 (IDT))
Subject: Re: Patch: sentinels for typedefs in headers
References:  <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000614162012 DOT 841A-100000 AT is>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> > question again. Perhaps we will get an answer if we are persistent?
> 
> Sounds like a good idea.

It's customary to wait at least a month before resending a patch.
Assume that a similarly long period is the polite way to deal with
ignored requests.  They're busy.