Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 16:21:59 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Patch: sentinels for typedefs in headers
In-Reply-To: <200006141120.NAA19541@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000614162012.841A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Martin Stromberg wrote:

> So I interpreted this no-answer-attitude as the gcc maintainers
> thinking they have another newbie whining at them, when e. g. Laurynas
> asked them. Hence making me think that the person who ported gcc to
> DOZE might have a better chance of getting a response.

You might as well be right.  There's nothing I know that can back up my 
guess; I might be wrong.

> An other idea: perhaps Laurenyas could ask that (exactly same)
> question again. Perhaps we will get an answer if we are persistent?

Sounds like a good idea.