Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 17:11:23 -0400
Message-Id: <200006122111.RAA31720@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <39454056.9A188121@softhome.net> (message from Laurynas Biveinis
	on Mon, 12 Jun 2000 22:56:06 +0300)
Subject: Re: Patch: sentinels for typedefs in headers
References:  <39454056 DOT 9A188121 AT softhome DOT net>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> __DJ_foo_t
> #undef __DJ_foo_t
> #define __DJ_foo_t

Note that I still think it's bogus that we have to bend to gcc's will,
instead of them accepting posix-compatible headers.  But, I see no
harm in the patch either, unless someday some *other* header uses
those also to disable djgpp's specific declarations.

> I am not sure if wc204.txi needs updating, because this is internal
> change.

It should, but only a minor note need be added.