From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200006121530.RAA29570@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: LONG: fat32 diff in cvs (second try)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000612152842.5082A-100000@is> from Eli Zaretskii at "Jun 12, 2000 03:29:50 pm"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 17:30:04 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to Eli Zaretskii:
> One more tidbit: the docs for FSEXT should be updated with the new 
> FSEXT_llseek symbol.

Ok. But I have a question, in fsext.h there are:
typedef enum {
  __FSEXT_nop,
  __FSEXT_open,
  __FSEXT_creat,
  __FSEXT_read,
  __FSEXT_write,
  __FSEXT_ready,
  __FSEXT_close,
  __FSEXT_fcntl,
  __FSEXT_ioctl,
  __FSEXT_lseek,
  __FSEXT_link,
  __FSEXT_unlink,
  __FSEXT_dup,
  __FSEXT_dup2,
  __FSEXT_fstat,
  __FSEXT_stat,
  __FSEXT_llseek
} __FSEXT_Fnumber;

But the texinfo document also mentions __FSEXT_ready_read,
__FSEXT_ready_write and __FSEXT_ready_error. Shouldn't these two
places match? I must be missing something.


Right,

							MartinS