Message-Id: <200006071635.TAA25156@alpha.netvision.net.il>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 19:34:47 +0200
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.1.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5b
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: lauras AT softhome DOT net
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <393D2B44.38FA3A52@softhome.net> (message from Laurynas Biveinis
	on Tue, 06 Jun 2000 19:48:04 +0300)
Subject: Re: EMLINK / ELOOP ?
References: <393D1398 DOT F7DD2D7A AT softhome DOT net> <200006061700 DOT UAA20903 AT mailgw1 DOT netvision DOT net DOT il> <393D2B44 DOT 38FA3A52 AT softhome DOT net>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 19:48:04 +0300
> From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
> 
> OK, but maybe just changing "Doesn't support links" to "Doesn't support
> hard links" would clarify it without increasing pedanticism?

If adding "hard" clarifies this, then I have nothing against such a
change.