Message-ID: <393B7081.DBD8EC8B@softhome.net> Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 12:18:57 +0300 From: Laurynas Biveinis X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: ANSI C and stdio.h References: <3937DEA9 DOT 63606B27 AT softhome DOT net> <200006021918 DOT PAA03693 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3938C1DE DOT E005BBA9 AT softhome DOT net> <200006030953 DOT MAA01306 AT alpha DOT netvision DOT net DOT il> <39394EC9 DOT 91B87484 AT softhome DOT net> <393AA7CF DOT 51E1DE11 AT softhome DOT net> <200006042012 DOT QAA08975 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com DJ Delorie wrote: > > > Here is the first reply I got there. This guy does not point > > to the exact place to the standard, but he is one of the major > > posters there. It seems we've got a problem there. If there > > will be no other opinions in c.s.c, I'll make a patch for this > > issue. > > As long as any patch has absolutely *no* chance of causing problems. Will the requirement to include stdarg.h in order to use vprintf() count as problem? IMHO there already is a problem - we encourage users to write unportable code. Their 'strictly ANSI' code will stop compiling on other 'strictly ANSI' system. > Standards aside, we've had a lot of luck with our headers and have > gotten almost no FAQs about them due to obsessive standards > compliance. There are a number of headers that are this way (for > example, sys/stat.h doesn't require sys/types.h) and I'd rather this > continue working than cause problems for users in the name of > "standards". Those sys/*.h headers are OK - they aren't covered by ANSI and they will continue 'just work' The number of affected ANSI headers is very limited. Laurynas