Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2000 16:12:03 -0400
Message-Id: <200006042012.QAA08975@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <393AA7CF.51E1DE11@softhome.net> (message from Laurynas Biveinis
	on Sun, 04 Jun 2000 22:02:39 +0300)
Subject: Re: ANSI C and stdio.h
References: <3937DEA9 DOT 63606B27 AT softhome DOT net> <200006021918 DOT PAA03693 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3938C1DE DOT E005BBA9 AT softhome DOT net> <200006030953 DOT MAA01306 AT alpha DOT netvision DOT net DOT il> <39394EC9 DOT 91B87484 AT softhome DOT net> <393AA7CF DOT 51E1DE11 AT softhome DOT net>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Here is the first reply I got there. This guy does not point
> to the exact place to the standard, but he is one of the major
> posters there. It seems we've got a problem there. If there
> will be no other opinions in c.s.c, I'll make a patch for this
> issue.

As long as any patch has absolutely *no* chance of causing problems.
Standards aside, we've had a lot of luck with our headers and have
gotten almost no FAQs about them due to obsessive standards
compliance.  There are a number of headers that are this way (for
example, sys/stat.h doesn't require sys/types.h) and I'd rather this
continue working than cause problems for users in the name of
"standards".