Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 16:19:23 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: LONG: fat32 diff in cvs
In-Reply-To: <200006011229.OAA09332@father.ludd.luth.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000601161848.20285D-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Martin Str|mberg wrote:

> But now when I look at the result I see that the only
> part of the code that calls _is_fat32() is statfs. And the caching was
> done to speed up open() and friends... So i suggest we throw away the
> caching (you don't usually call statfs that much).

Yes, in that case, caching is not necessary.