From: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 13:06:06 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: __dosexec_find_on_path question
Message-ID: <39350E3E.8018.287111@localhost>
In-reply-to: <200005311650.TAA17554@alpha.netvision.net.il>
References: <3934E7C8 DOT 26244 DOT 7A952 AT localhost> (snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com)
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> > From: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
> > Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 10:22:00 -0400
> >
> > Does the same thing need to be done to __dosexec_find_on_path?
> 
> Sorry, I didn't understand this question.  We *are* talking about
> __dosexec_find_on_path, aren't we?
> 

Actually, my patch is for __spawnve. __dosexec_find_on_path doesn't need to 
be patched if it's an internal libc function. I assume it's meant to be 
internal-only because it's not documented in libc.info.

Mark