Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 14:42:44 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Pierre Muller <muller AT cerbere DOT u-strasbg DOT fr>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Simple C program showing FPU problem !
In-Reply-To: <200005231133.NAA06460@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000523144100.5702A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 23 May 2000, Pierre Muller wrote:

> >Shouldn't we access the I/O port *before* clearing the exceptions, like 
> >Intel says?
> 
>   Maybe, I did not try the other way around !

One more question: how does your change affect the situation when one 
DJGPP program runs another, and the child program triggers an FP 
exception?  Does the parent still get the exception instead of the child, 
or does something change?