Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 20:06:51 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Minor GCC & DJGPP header problem
In-Reply-To: <200005171526.LAA09310@envy.delorie.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000517200555.3689C-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 17 May 2000, DJ Delorie wrote:

> Neither is really acceptable.  GCC shouldn't conflict with conforming
> system headers.

Yes, I agree.  Fortunately, it looks like this particular problem is 
going to be solved the Right Way, after all...