Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 11:16:04 -0400
Message-Id: <200005111516.LAA23881@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200005111323.JAA13150@indy.delorie.com> (message from Eli
	Zaretskii on Thu, 11 May 2000 09:23:49 -0400 (EDT))
Subject: Re: Idea: Cutting edge DJGPP (alpha DJGPP?)
References: <200005101432 DOT QAA05227 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> <200005101455 DOT KAA30957 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <39197AB0 DOT 48169971 AT softhome DOT net> <200005101628 DOT MAA31643 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <200005111323 DOT JAA13150 AT indy DOT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> > If we can come to some consensus about who should be
> > allowed to check things in (history, reliability, quality, etc), I'm
> > willing to add some more people to that list to spread the work
> > around.
> 
> Yes, please!

OK, then.  Note to all: if you are interested in working in djgpp's
core, and can do remote CVS, and are willing and able to take
responsibility for your patches, and think that the DJGPP community
will trust you to Do The Right Thing, now's the time to speak up!