Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 12:32:14 -0400
Message-Id: <200005101632.MAA31683@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <39197A51.7A0261E@softhome.net> (message from Laurynas Biveinis
	on Wed, 10 May 2000 18:03:45 +0300)
Subject: Re: Idea: Cutting edge DJGPP (alpha DJGPP?)
References: <200005101432 DOT QAA05227 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> <39197A51 DOT 7A0261E AT softhome DOT net>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> At first I thought that CVS branching would be OK, but it seems that
> DJ has some reasons not do to so, doesn't he?

Branches are a pain to merge.  It's easier to just do it in the main
trunk, aside from the slowdown just before a release.