From: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 14:32:59 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: Minor DJGPP fixes
Message-ID: <390D959B.10915.9F911@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20000501090704.M11780@wolery.cumb.org> 
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

[to djgpp-workers only]

> Because I never dreamed that any system wouldn't support that
> particular fcntl() operation.  It's been around since forever in
> Unix.  I'm tempted to tell you to fix your library.

I know he plans to no longer use O_NONBLOCK, but I also think he's right. I 
see no reason why 'fcntl (fd, F_SETFL, 0)' should not succeed, since it's 
changing 'fd' to blocking mode, which is the only mode libc can handle 
anyway.

Mark