Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 09:07:04 -0700 From: Zack Weinberg To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Laurynas Biveinis , gcc-patches AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: Minor DJGPP fixes Message-ID: <20000501090704.M11780@wolery.cumb.org> References: <390C769C DOT 812EAB7D AT softhome DOT net> <20000501000928 DOT J11780 AT wolery DOT cumb DOT org> <200005010837 DOT EAA00013 AT indy DOT delorie DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.12i In-Reply-To: <200005010837.EAA00013@indy.delorie.com>; from eliz@delorie.com on Mon, May 01, 2000 at 04:37:09AM -0400 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 04:37:09AM -0400, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > - fcntl() working is a characteristic of the _host_, not the target. > > - You should determine if it works using an autoconf test. > > Why didn't the original code use an Autoconf test, then? I understand > that it was added only recently. Because I never dreamed that any system wouldn't support that particular fcntl() operation. It's been around since forever in Unix. I'm tempted to tell you to fix your library. > > - If it doesn't work, you need to open the file in blocking mode, not > > just elide the fcntl(); otherwise the code reading the file will > > break. > > Could you please explain what does ``open in blocking mode'' mean? > Isn't a normal default `open' good enough? If not, why not? I think this has been adequately explained elsewhere. zw