Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 16:27:16 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200004272027.QAA25556@indy.delorie.com>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT delorie DOT com>
To: Pierre Muller <muller AT cerbere DOT u-strasbg DOT fr>
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200004271332.PAA01783@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr> (message from Pierre
	Muller on Thu, 27 Apr 2000 15:18:21 +0200)
Subject: Re: interrupt 0x75 limitation in Win95 ?
References: <3907023C DOT 30855 DOT 3E86E3 AT localhost> <200004271332 DOT PAA01783 AT cerbere DOT u-strasbg DOT fr>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 15:18:21 +0200
> From: Pierre Muller <muller AT cerbere DOT u-strasbg DOT fr>
>
>   I get a nice FPU exception,
> but if I redirect the output of this code using DJGPP redir executable 
> it does not work anymore :(
> 
>   The exception seems to be sent to the redir executable rather than to the
> correct executable !

Sorry, I don't understand what does this mean: ``exception seems to be
sent to redir''.

What exactly happens?  Does `redir' crash instead of the program which
divides by zero?  If so, please post the crash message with stack
traceback.

>   Is this a know bug of Win95 (it works under raw Dos !) ??

Windows does have some nasty problems in this area.  Are you using
DJGPP v2.03?  The exit code in v2.03 tries to work around at least
some of these problems in Windows, but I'm not sure it solves all of
them.