From: Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Message-Id: <200004261543.RAA29687@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Subject: Re: The new cwsdpmi
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 17:43:18 +0200 (MET DST)
In-Reply-To: <10004261328.AA14717@clio.rice.edu> from "Charles Sandmann" at Apr 26, 2000 08:28:26 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> > FWIW, CWSDPMI r5 is working for me with no visible problems (P166,
> > 64MB of RAM, pleanty of disk space, DOS 5.0, QEMM 8).
> 
> It could be a tight memory issue.  A 386 issue. A Himem vs vcpi issue.
> Hard to tell at this point.

If you want to simulate tight memory, making a ramdisk of a big size
will reduce the available memory with that much.


Right,

							MartinS