From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200004231348.PAA22098@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: EILSEQ in errno.h
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com (DJGPP-WORKERS)
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 15:48:07 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

The C99 standard specifies a third error value for errno.h, EILSEQ.
Should we insert in between EDOM and ERANGE (like it is in the
standard document), and thereby pushing the values of ERANGE and the
rest up one step?


Right,

							MartinS