Message-Id: <200004111904.PAA14450@qnx.com>
Subject: Re: Porting problems with Sh-utils (beta)
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:03:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Alain Magloire" <alain AT qnx DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <38F328FD.14716.A0819@localhost> from "Mark E." at Apr 11, 2000 01:30:37 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL0b1]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> 
> > I think your input is important, we seem to be unsure whether the
> > ported Bash has a bug or perhaps it's a bug in the Sh-utils pretest.
> > 
> 
> It would be a help to know where can one obtain the sh-utils pretest and see 
> the actual snippet in question. URL anyone?

http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/fetish/


-- 
au revoir, alain
----
Aussi haut que l'on soit assis, on n'est toujours assis que sur son cul !!!