Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 10:42:45 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Fastest integer type
In-Reply-To: <200003141609.RAA19975@mars.lu.erisoft.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000315104224.17230I-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Martin Stromberg wrote:

> So if I use ints for all but FASTEST64_INT, we have the fastest, it seems.

Probably.

It won't hurt to look at what Linux and possibly other x86-based
platforms define, just to be on the safe side.