From: Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Message-Id: <200003060929.KAA16122@mars.lu.erisoft.se>
Subject: Re: iso646.h and some questions
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 10:29:21 +0100 (MET)
In-Reply-To: <200003052154.QAA17956@qnx.com> from "Alain Magloire" at Mar 05, 2000 04:54:08 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> > No. The standard says NULL is defined in wchar.h and in stddef.h.
> 
> Yes but it does not say, it should be a specific macro, it just mean
> that if one #include <wchar.h>  they can use NULL because it will be defined
> Most <wchar.h> will just #include <stddef.h> to pull the relevant macros.

But for inttypes.h it explicitly says that inttypes.h #includes
stdint.h. So I get the impression that files shouldn't #include each
other unless it is stated. 


Right,

							MartinS