Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2000 12:16:14 +0200 (WET) From: Andris Pavenis To: "Mark E." cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Binutils 2.9.5 beta 1 released In-Reply-To: <200003031517.KAA01240@delorie.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 3 Mar 2000, Mark E. wrote: > Binutils 2.9.5 beta 1 is now available from SimTel mirrors. There are three > archives: > > ftp://ftp.simtel.net/pub/simtelnet/gnu/djgpp/v2gnu/bnu2951.README > ftp://ftp.simtel.net/pub/simtelnet/gnu/djgpp/v2gnu/bnu2951b.zip > ftp://ftp.simtel.net/pub/simtelnet/gnu/djgpp/v2gnu/bnu2951s.zip > ftp://ftp.simtel.net/pub/simtelnet/gnu/djgpp/v2gnu/bnu2951x.zip > ftp://ftp.simtel.net/pub/simtelnet/gnu/djgpp/v2gnu/bnu2951a.zip > > GNU Binutils provide the basic tools for assembling and linking files > produced by the GCC compiler plus other tools that examine object and > executable files. > > This release is based on the February 27, 2000 contents of the Binutils CVS > repository and so is not based on an official GNU release. The last release > is now almost two years old and a new one is not yet in the works. Given this > situation, releasing a newer version of Binutils for the DJGPP community for > use seems approriate. > About CRC failures in bnu2951s.zip in Simtelnet: I also experienced similar problems with some attempts to upload gcc related archives to ftp.delorie.com (and as I remember I was not alone): So perhaps we should always send MD5SUMs to DJ for tests and he should try to find a weak place where problems appears. Now about this release: I don't really need full source archive, only patch (diffs.dos). 1) It was DOS style text file. It would be better to have UNIX style text file (I'm patching binutils and building them for DJGPP using cross-compiling under Linux) 2) Patch doesn't apply without questions to me (failure to find some files). I used patch-2.5.3 under Linux. 3) Is it really needed to patch configure (as it is generated file). If one applies patches to different binutils snapshot he/she is expected to know how to use autoconf. At least patch for configure failed as perhaps You used file generated by DJGPP port of autoconf I haven't done any tests yet (with CVS version updated yesterday morning - March 3, 2000) except I didn't met other problems building snapshot for DJGPP under Linux. Andris