Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 19:46:32 +0200 (WET)
From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Update of gcc-2.95.2
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000206094525.7505P-100000@is>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.05.10002081941140.181564-100000@ieva01.lanet.lv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Sun, 6 Feb 2000, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> 
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Andris Pavenis wrote:
> 
> > One more thing is that its very likely I'll build binaries for DJGPP
> > under Linux (cross-compiling).
> 
> It is still advisory to try building the *s.zip distribution on
> Windows (and on DOS, if that's possible), if only for testing
> purposes.  Otherwise, you might produce a source distribution that
> doesn't build on anything but Linux, which is hardly a good idea.
> 

Ok. I really built all under Win95. All seems to be Ok (however not much
tests done yet). However I haven't really included cross-compiling stuff I
mentioned before. 

About building source archive under Win9X: I think it's really recommended 
as script that generates gcc2952s.zip runs autoconf and autoheader (so
they shold be ones from DJGPP distribution). I don't think there are 
other problems for building source archive under Linux.

Andris