Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 13:15:11 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: make depend
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.05.10001241001590.112552-100000@ieva01.lanet.lv>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000124131200.11358E-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Andris Pavenis wrote:

> And if we are using 
> '-imacros %sdjgpp.ver' hack already in building specs then it should work
> at build time. I had problems with gcc-2.96 snapshots and earlier hack.

Ah, okay.  So the problems with 2.96 were actually during build time, 
not in using -macros after the compiler is installed, right? 

> Perhaps I'll install it in lib/gcc-lib/djgpp/$version anyway.

Okay.

> Only reason why to have it in $DJDIR/lib is to make it removal
> from dependencies more easy. Perhaps I can move it and place it in
> $DJDIR/lib myself (in gcc295Xb.zip).

You can do this as well, it shouldn't do any harm as long as the GCC 
distribution is the only one which comes with that file.