Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 09:44:52 +0200 (IST) From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz AT is To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: make depend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Andris Pavenis wrote: > If we'll put djgpp.ver in the same directory where xgcc.exe is > located it should work better I don't see anything wrong with having that file in any directory under %DJDIR%. But I don't understand what does ``where xgcc.exe is located'' means. There's no xgcc.exe in the binary distribution, AFAIK xgcc exists only while GCC is being built. So in what directory should we put this file for the best results? > About name: I think it's better to avoid using extension .h there. > What name do You suggest? If there are good reasons to avoid a .h extension, then I don't have anything against djgpp.ver. Why do you suggest to avoid the .h extension? > Also with time we could add it to DJDEV (lib/djgpp.ver) That's what I had in mind. Perhaps we will need to update djdev203 anyway (see the problems with djgpp.djl), in which case I'd like to add this file there already. Do you see any reasons why this might be a bad idea?