Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 20:26:56 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: make depend
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.05.10001201900080.72642-100000@ieva01.lanet.lv>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000120202326.28824C-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Andris Pavenis wrote:

> 	-imacros %sdjgpp.ver
> 		Were we have $prefix/lib/gcc-lib/$version/djgpp.ver
> 		containing '#include <sys/version.h>'. Should work
> 		for both native and cross-compilers however I have 
> 		tested it with native compiler only (yet). 
> 		This file could be distributed with gcc binaries.
> 		In future we could add $DJDIR/lib/djgpp.ver with
> 		this contents and we'll be able to remove it from
> 		DJGPP distribution
> 
> Perhaps the last one looks more nice but this is my opinion only 

Does it work with GCC 2.96?  If not, what is its advantage as compared to 
the current method?

If it does work with 2.96, then let's switch.  Perhaps the name should be 
different (since it's an include file); something with a .h extension.

Btw, what is the reason the current method doesn't work with 2.96?  They 
didn't remove -imacros, I presume?