Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 18:34:32 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
cc: salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: GDB, DOS 6.22, CWSDPMI and Interrupts
In-Reply-To: <10001031505.AA18083@clio.rice.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000103183149.18320E-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 3 Jan 100, Charles Sandmann wrote:

> I'm beginning to thik this is a interrupt 31 assumption that the debug
> code makes incorrectly.  Most Int31 internal code runs with interrupts
> enabled - cwsdpmi with int31 disabled.  It could be the debug code is
> picking up the wrong flag.

Sorry, I'm afraid I'm not following.  Which ``Int31 internal code'' runs 
with interrupts enabled, and when/where does CWSDPMI disable interrupts?