Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 10:49:04 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
cc: salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: GDB, DOS 6.22, CWSDPMI and Interrupts
In-Reply-To: <10001021628.AA02691@clio.rice.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000103104832.14725F-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 2 Jan 100, Charles Sandmann wrote:

> Back in r3? r2? there were optimizations added to handle int31 mostly in
> protected mode, and it's quite possible when hooked they don't handle the
> interrupt flag right.  We probably ought to try it on the previous 
> releases of CWSDPMI (beta 9 - r3) and see when it worked, if ever.

I just tried with CWSDPMI v0.9r1, the version distributed with Quake
(dated July 12, 1996), and the problem exists there as well.