Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 10:40:31 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Old config.guess patch
In-Reply-To: <386759E9.F970A82F@softhome.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.991229104015.11728W-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 27 Dec 1999, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:

> While recovering my patches from mail archives, I've recalled
> that my config.guess patch for uname() returning CPU type
> hasn't been sent to any GNU maintainer. I'm going to send
> it to Autoconf maintainer, is this correct?

Is the change compatible with the old version of `uname'?  Since the
`uname' change will not be in v2.03, it is IMHO unwise to submit
changes to config.guess that will not work with current versions of
DJGPP.

I'm not sure who maintains config.guess.  Does anybody know?