From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv Message-ID: To: Eli Zaretskii , djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 16:14:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: lib/specs in djcrxNNN.zip In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12b) Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 14 Dec 99, at 14:20, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > As you might or might not know, the lib/specs file was removed from the > djdevNNN.zip distribution, since it is supposed to come with gccNNNb.zip. > > However, it is not clear to me whether it should also be removed from > djcrxNNN.zip, and if not, what version of lib/specs should we keep there. > I need to decide on this in preparation to (hopefully, final) alpha > release of v2.03. > > Could people who actually used djcrx please tell what their opinions > are? Thanks in advance. > We'll I'm using cross-compiler (i586-pc-linux-gnu to i586-pc- msdosdjgpp) but I realy never tried to build it using djcrx20X.zip. I simply compiled stubify and put it on path built binutils (I have posted scripts I used some time ago) build gcc as cross-compiler (related script were included in gcc2952s.zip) Only browsing sources shows that many files (like cross/makefile) have not been changed for a very long time and it still mentions gcc-2.7.2 which is terribly outdated. As result I didn't want to mess with djcrxNNN.zip too much and I choosed my own way... About lib/specs: If gcc finds his own copy and we don't need any aditional hacks in specs then I suggest not to have file /lib/specs. I cannot say how it will work with old gcc versions (like gcc-2.7.2 or gcc-2.8.1) though. Andris