Date: Sun, 31 Oct 1999 09:43:01 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: -g vs -s
In-Reply-To: <199910282353.TAA27690@envy.delorie.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.991031094239.2988K-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, DJ Delorie wrote:

> > Can you do anything useful with a core dump (a minimal stack backtrace?)
> 
> There are no core dumps in djgpp; only symify.

Suppose we did have core files: how would this change things?  I'd
think it won't, since symify is the functional equivalent of the core
dump as far as the backtrace is concerned.  I don't think stripping
prevents core dump from happening on Unix, does it?