Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 16:01:41 -0400 Message-Id: <199910282001.QAA26264@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: -g vs -s Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Should a lack of -g (or -g*) imply -s in a gcc link? It seems to be a FAQ, and the users should be able to specify "-g0" to untrigger the "-s".