Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 07:42:55 -0400
Message-Id: <199910031142.HAA06622@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
CC: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.991003115450.16555A-100000@is> (message from Eli
	Zaretskii on Sun, 3 Oct 1999 11:55:27 +0200 (IST))
Subject: Re: __dpmi_set_coprocessor_emulation
References:  <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 991003115450 DOT 16555A-100000 AT is>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


Well, you seem to have more information than I do, so go ahead and do
what your info says if you think it's the right thing.

I think the idea is that if MP=0, you get a "no fpu" exception even
if you *do* have an fpu.

Perhaps CWSDPMI masks MP becuase it needs to stay *set* for emulation
to work properly?