Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 13:02:11 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Wish for gcc .95x (stabs)
In-Reply-To: <199909091851.UAA05636@robby.dittmannsdorf.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990913130139.8923C-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Robert Hoehne wrote:

> I have a wish for the coming gcc 2.95x. Would it be possible
> to make the stabs debugging format the default debugging format?

IMHO, we need at least to rewrite SYMIFY to support stabs, before we
can do that.

> I don't know if there are many users who play with fsdb and edebug32,
> but I think most people will use gdb or derived debuggers and for those
> is stabs debugging much more usefull. 

A simple change to specs is all that is needed, if you want this as your
private default.