Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 19:12:03 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
cc: DJGPP Workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: symlink() & is_v2_prog() question
In-Reply-To: <37CAA384.596E068A@softhome.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990830190800.10193F-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:

> > Call me a coward.  I'm afraid to break a good thing that DJGPP is now.
> 
> I understand you. So symlinks will wait. For a long time.

No, that's not what I meant to say.  I was just explaining my views.  
However, I won't dream dictating my views to the rest if I'm the only one 
who shares them.

As DJ wrote once, a long time ago, ``DJGPP is a benevolent monarchy''.  
But I am not the monarch ;-).

So if you want to work on this, please do.  If nobody else besides me 
objects, your work will be included in v2.04.