Message-ID: <37CAA384.596E068A@softhome.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 17:30:12 +0200
From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: lt,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC: DJGPP Workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: symlink() & is_v2_prog() question
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990830165106 DOT 1411D-100000 AT is>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> No, I meant that we shouldn't get anywhere near the v2.0 status in future
> versions at all.  When v2.0 was released, there were several people who
> actively developed DJGPP and who understood very well the intricacies of
> the DJGPP environment.  I don't expect that to be true in the future.

It seems that I'm few years too late... ;-)

> Call me a coward.  I'm afraid to break a good thing that DJGPP is now.

I understand you. So symlinks will wait. For a long time.

Laurynas Biveinis