Message-Id: <199908251657.SAA03977@robby.dittmannsdorf.de>
From: Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net>
Organization: none provided
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 18:59:50 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: RHIDE section in DJGPP.ENV
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990824082953.12112F-100000@is>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.11)
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Is the following a good idea (for v2.03)?  Are there any other 
> RHIDE-related variables that we should put into this section?
> 
> *** djgpp.en~	Mon Jul  5 10:26:00 1999
> --- djgpp.env	Mon Aug 23 12:21:18 1999
> ***************
> *** 112,114 ****
> --- 112,118 ----
>   MANPATH=%/>MANPATH%;%DJDIR%/man;%DJDIR%/info
>   PAGER=%DJDIR%/bin/less.exe
>   
> + [rhide]
> + RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS_DJGPP.cc=stdcxx
> + RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS_DJGPP.cxx=stdcxx
> + RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS_DJGPP.cpp=stdcxx
> 

Only the following is needed:

[rhide]
RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS_DJGPP.cc=stdcxx

since the other variables expand internally already to the
...cc variables if not overwritten by the user.

Theoretical there is no need for that section in djgpp.env, since
I'll try to bring out a new RHIDE version before DJGPP 2.03, but
just in case I'm not ready with it before the new DJGPP release
this is a good idea.

Robert

******************************************************
* email:   Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net>     *
* Post:    Am Berg 3, D-09573 Dittmannsdorf, Germany *
* WWW:     http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~sho/rho        *
******************************************************