Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 15:20:57 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net>
Subject: Re: RHIDE section in DJGPP.ENV
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990824082953.12112F-100000@is>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990825152016.2834n-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, I wrote:

> Is the following a good idea (for v2.03)?  Are there any other 
> RHIDE-related variables that we should put into this section?
> 
> *** djgpp.en~	Mon Jul  5 10:26:00 1999
> --- djgpp.env	Mon Aug 23 12:21:18 1999
> ***************
> *** 112,114 ****
> --- 112,118 ----
>   MANPATH=%/>MANPATH%;%DJDIR%/man;%DJDIR%/info
>   PAGER=%DJDIR%/bin/less.exe
>   
> + [rhide]
> + RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS_DJGPP.cc=stdcxx
> + RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS_DJGPP.cxx=stdcxx
> + RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS_DJGPP.cpp=stdcxx

How about this:

*** djgpp.e~1	Mon Aug 23 12:21:18 1999
--- djgpp.env	Tue Aug 24 19:25:06 1999
***************
*** 116,118 ****
--- 116,119 ----
  RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS_DJGPP.cc=stdcxx
  RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS_DJGPP.cxx=stdcxx
  RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS_DJGPP.cpp=stdcxx
+ RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS_DJGPP.f=g2c m