From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
Message-ID: <B0000098829@stargate.astr.lu.lv>
To: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com,
        Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 20:53:08 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: gcc-2.95.1
In-reply-to: <199908191728.RAA136158@out4.ibm.net>
References: <B0000098665 AT stargate DOT astr DOT lu DOT lv>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12a)
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On 19 Aug 99, at 13:28, Mark E. wrote:

> > > Exceptions do not work for me. Here the sample file I used:
> > 
> > This example works Ok for me with:
> >  	gcc-2.95 + binutils-2.9.1 + DJGPP CVS version (end of July)
> > 	gcc-2.95.1 + binutils-990817 snapshot + DJGPP CVS version (16
> >                               August)
> >        gcc-2.95.1 + binutils-2.8.1(from Simtelnet) + djdev202 (unchanged)
> > 
> > In all cases no my additional changes to djgpp.djl
> > 
> 
> I can reproduce the problem with Robert's sample program.
> gcc-2.95 + stock 2.02 djgpp.djl + binutils-990812 snapshot == crash

Of course. Patch for long section names in djgpp.djl is needed here. 
With updated djgpp.djl and 990812 snapshot example works.

> gcc-2.95 + djgpp.djl with EH changes for long section names + same bnu  == success
> 

Andris