Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 15:13:56 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
Subject: Re: Performance regression of 2.95 vs. 2.7, x86, loop-related (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199908091202.MAA18292@out1.ibm.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990809151150.2359H-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Mark E. wrote:

> My patch was put in last night (along with your find-nearest-line change), so we now 
> have 16-byte alignment.

Great!

Is the 16-byte alignment patch for one file?  If so, could you tell 
its name?  If not, perhaps you could post that patch here?

(Yes, I know my patch was also checked in: Ian wrote me about it.)