Message-ID: <37A9E4A0.E6A63773@softhome.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 1999 21:23:12 +0200
From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: lt,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: config.guess patch for new uname()
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990805163555 DOT 10909A-100000 AT is>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> I would like to hear opinions about whether we should change `uname' now
> or leave it for the next DJGPP release (i.e. 2.04).

If you want to make 2.03 bugfix-only release, then uname better should
wait. It is definitely not a bugfix.

Laurynas Biveinis