Message-Id: <199908051235.HAA13563@darwin.sfbr.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 07:35:42 -0500 (CDT)
From: Jeff Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
Subject: Re: CPU identification (Was: Re: uname -m ?)
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-MD5: o0SvFhXzpVbLu7HSSOYoAg==
X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.3.4 SunOS 5.7 sun4u sparc 
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

-: if all what "uname -m" has to do is print i[3-6]86,
-: then this program below should do it correctly. I

Would there be any point in having `uname' also test for and
report the presence of a functional FPU for those processors
where it was actually an option (e.g., with 386s, and with
some crippled 486 versions, IIRC).