Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 07:10:44 -0400
Message-Id: <199908041110.HAA07932@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990804094433.6630B-100000@is> (message from Eli
	Zaretskii on Wed, 4 Aug 1999 09:45:05 +0300 (IDT))
Subject: Re: __stub_foo macros in header files
References:  <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990804094433 DOT 6630B-100000 AT is>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Then how about changing `kill's behavior instead, so this case would
> be easily detectable by an application?  Right now, we simply return
> non-zero and don't even set errno.

This is a bug itself, then.  For unknown pids (not self, not zero,
whatever) we should return a proper error condition (no such
proccess).