Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 09:56:48 -0400
Message-Id: <199908031356.JAA15480@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990803103541.1847E-100000@is> (message from Eli
	Zaretskii on Tue, 3 Aug 1999 10:36:30 +0300 (IDT))
Subject: Re: __stub_foo macros in header files
References:  <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990803103541 DOT 1847E-100000 AT is>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


Hmmm... kill() works, there just never is another program suitable for
tail to monitor.  Wouldn't tail just print "no such process" or
something?  Since we don't have a ps, how would they guess pids
anyway?  To me, I'd say it was supported but useless, and I wouldn't
do anything special to it.

As for the __stub hack, I think it's a hack and I'd rather avoid
adding hacks to djgpp's headers.