Message-Id: <199907211319.NAA205012@out2.ibm.net>
From: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 09:19:52 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: config.site review request
References: <199907201501 DOT PAA167196 AT out2 DOT ibm DOT net>
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990721105227.7757E-100000@is>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.11)
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> 
> Would Bash 2.03 even compile and work correctly with stock DJGPP
> v2.02 or earlier?

It works now with the three or four modified libc files that are linked in.

> 
> Even if it does, do we really want to deprive users of building with
> /dev/env/DJDIR as the prefix for the sake of those rare cases where a
> new Bash is compiled with an obsolete libc? 

As long as 2.02 is the latest official release, it is not obsolete.

Mark

--- 
Mark Elbrecht, snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com
http://snowball.frogspace.net/