Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 15:57:14 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc-2.95 19990714 prerelease) 
In-Reply-To: <B0000094836@stargate.astr.lu.lv>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990715155201.5658C-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 15 Jul 1999 pavenis AT lanet DOT lv wrote:

> I also didn't enable HAIFA scheduler or changed away from default
> alignments. Perhaps these things are for gcc-3.0

I would rather suggest to switch to 16-byte alignment now.  It seems that 
gcc 2.96 already does that anyway, at least on Linux.

It would be nice to have the next GCC and Binutils configured for 16-byte
code alignment.  The library is already ready for that, so what's left is 
to change the configuration in Binutils and GCC.